You HAD to know that Epstein had the lock on the elite before he got whacked by his own hand or others because we do not definitively know at this point but suspicions rampant. But when you see how sex permeated into the common denominator access cloaked in alleged protected at the highest levels secret maneuvers that allowed the rich to act with impunity in regards to how alleged perversion could come back to haunt them in professional as well as personal lives it all makes sense doesn’t it?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12136305/Trove-Jeffrey-Epsteins-emails-calendar-entries-reveals-pedophiles-network-power.html

Guess this UK bank thinks it’s customers are complete idiots by taking this OVER THE TOP ridiculous step in placing themselves in an oversight process in regards to documentation of cash “maneuvers” to ostensibly protect their customers from scams. Looks to us the scam IS THE BANK as we have always believed in caveat emptor (LET THE BUYER BEWARE) which is on the customer, NOT THE BANK as liability falls on the person in any given transactional situation, NOT the institution.Looks to us one of 2 things. First, an excuse to limit cash withdrawals by fear of heightened level of scrutiny and Two unrestricted increased surveillance of customer’s financial profile which, other than primary activity of deposits and withdrawals, in NONE OF THEIR BUSINESS.Always seems the Commonwealth countries in concert with the Bank of England are first to make these banking plays. Think Canada with the Freedom Convoy confiscation of assets last year.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/major-bank-demands-customers-prove-withdrawals-are-valid-warns-cash-can-be-refused-at-will/ar-AA1bO0Au?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=ca8c5ce1b5be47438ebf2c43cf0c75e7&ei=45